BEAD builders

Every dollar overbilled is a location that never gets built.

A BEAD grant is a fixed pool of money, and make-ready is one of its most volatile line items. The rules already limit what a pole owner can shift onto your build. Here is how those rules work, and how to make sure they actually get applied to your invoices.

Recovered overcharges are buildable locations, not just cash back
Start here

Why does one overcharged invoice matter to a whole grant?

Because a BEAD award is not a reimbursable, open-ended budget. It is a fixed dollar amount tied to a specific list of locations, and make-ready is one of the most volatile line items in the entire build.

State broadband offices and industry surveys have flagged pole access and make-ready cost as one of the leading threats to BEAD timelines and budgets, with some regions reporting multi-year make-ready backlogs and cost estimates that vary wildly pole to pole. When a make-ready invoice runs high because of padding rather than real work, the shortfall does not disappear. It gets absorbed by cutting locations, requesting limited non-deployment funding where a state allows it, or coming out of the subgrantee's own margin. Reviewing make-ready costs is not a compliance formality on a BEAD build. It is direct leverage over how many homes actually get passed.

The rule that protects you

Who is actually supposed to pay for a pole replacement?

The FCC's cost-causation principle: an attacher pays for what its own attachment requires, not for fixing or upgrading a pole that was already deficient.

What a BEAD attacher owes

The incremental cost of making a pole ready for the new line: moving existing attachments to create clearance, or the marginal share of a replacement genuinely driven by the new attachment.

What often gets billed instead

The full cost of a new, taller pole that also cures a pre-existing code violation, replaces an already-overloaded pole, or upgrades capacity the owner keeps long after the BEAD build is finished.

The FCC's 2023 pole replacement order (FCC 23-109) put this in writing: a new attacher is not responsible for correcting pre-existing violations, and a utility may not require a requesting attacher to pay the entire cost of a pole replacement its attachment did not solely cause. The FCC has since put that principle to work on a live BEAD build. In February 2026, its Rapid Broadband Assessment Team used the new Accelerated Docket process to resolve a pole-replacement dispute between Comcast and Appalachian Power Company in just 60 days, ruling that Comcast owed only the incremental cost of a stronger pole, not the full replacement price, on a build the FCC's own order tied directly to a $126 million BEAD award covering roughly 13,000 Virginia locations. On a build with hundreds or thousands of poles, applying that distinction consistently is often the single largest cost-recovery opportunity in the entire project.

Where the money actually comes from

What happens if make-ready costs run over budget anyway?

Non-deployment BEAD funds are a real category states can spend on program costs outside direct construction, and industry groups have been pushing NTIA to formally allow pole-related cost overruns to draw from them. As of mid-2026 that guidance is still pending, not settled, so it is not a mechanism to count on yet.

Treat non-deployment funding as an open question, not a backstop already in place: NTIA has said guidance is coming, several states have said they are operating without clear rules on it in the meantime, and at least one state has already proposed using it for pole inspection and make-ready work in its own plan. Until that guidance lands, the one form of overrun protection a subgrantee can actually count on is not overpaying to begin with. Every dollar recovered from an overcharge, or never paid at all, is a dollar that does not have to wait on a funding mechanism that is not fully built yet.

What to do

How should a BEAD builder handle make-ready review?

Build the review into the build schedule itself, not as cleanup afterward.

01

Review the estimate before you accept it

Once an estimate is accepted, the 2026 Subpart J clock for make-ready starts running. Catching an inflated line before acceptance avoids both the overcharge and the delay of disputing it later.

02

Flag every full-cost pole replacement line

This is the single highest-value check on a BEAD build. Ask whether the pole was already deficient before your line was proposed, and whether the full replacement cost was shifted to you regardless.

03

Reconcile the true-up against the original estimate

A final invoice that simply matches the estimate, with no accounting for what was actually built, is a common place unearned cost quietly survives to the final bill.

04

Feed every finding into your cost tracking

Recovered overcharges should show up in your own project accounting as reclaimed budget, so the case for staying ahead of make-ready review is visible to whoever is managing the grant.

FAQ

BEAD make-ready cost questions, answered plainly.

Why does make-ready cost recovery matter more for BEAD-funded builds? +
BEAD grants are fixed. Every dollar spent on an inflated make-ready invoice is a dollar that cannot reach the next unserved location, and cost overruns can force a subgrantee to request non-deployment funds, renegotiate scope, or absorb the difference. Recovering an overcharge does not just refund cash, it restores buildable locations to the project.
Are BEAD subgrantees allowed to use non-deployment funds for make-ready overruns? +
Non-deployment funds are a real BEAD category, and industry groups have pushed NTIA to formally allow pole-related overruns to draw from them, but as of mid-2026 that guidance is still pending. Some states report operating without clear rules on it in the meantime. Until it is settled, do not count on it. Reviewing whether a make-ready charge was correct in the first place is the one form of cost protection a subgrantee can rely on today.
Who pays when a pole has to be replaced on a BEAD build? +
The FCC's cost-causation rules (FCC 23-109) hold that a new attacher is not responsible for correcting pre-existing code violations, and a pole owner cannot shift the full cost of a replacement onto a single new attacher when the pole's own condition, not the attachment, is what required the replacement. In February 2026 the FCC's Accelerated Docket process applied exactly this rule to a live BEAD-connected dispute between Comcast and a pole-owning utility, confirming the attacher owed only the incremental cost of the stronger pole. The attacher generally owes only the incremental cost its own attachment causes.
Does BEAD change who these cost-allocation rules apply to? +
Yes, for pole owners that take BEAD funding. Cooperative and municipal pole owners that were historically exempt from FCC pole attachment rules must now follow them once they accept BEAD money, across their entire pole footprint. See PoleProof's related page on cooperative and municipal pole rates after BEAD for the details.
Can PoleProof review make-ready costs before they are billed to a BEAD grant? +
Yes. Sending the make-ready estimate for review before payment is the cheapest place to catch an overcharge, since it never has to be clawed back later. PoleProof also reviews invoices already paid and true-ups against the original estimate, and returns a dispute-ready findings report within 10 business days.

Protect your BEAD budget before the invoice is final.

One free check. No account, no commitment. Send one invoice or estimate and your attachment agreement, and get a dispute-ready finding back within ten business days.

Run a free check