South DakotaSD
- Cooperative poles
- Split by chapter, which is the point. Electric cooperatives are out: SDCL 49-34A-1(12) removes rural electric cooperatives from the rate, reasonableness, nondiscrimination and rulemaking sections. Telephone cooperatives, on the text, are in, because SDCL 49-31-5.1 omits them, which leaves them under SDCL 49-31-15, SDCL 49-31-18 and chapter 49-13. Untested on poles
- Municipal poles
- No for municipal electric systems and consumers power districts, under the same exclusion, and SDCL 9-35-1 is a street and own rate power rather than an attachment regime. Municipal telephone systems, on the text, are in, by the same reasoning as telephone cooperatives
- Rate standard
- No state formula and no state rule. The FCC formulas apply on an investor owned electric or incumbent telephone pole. On a telephone pole inside the state regime, SDCL 49-31-18 requires reasonable compensation without discrimination, with no formula. Cooperative, municipal electric and federal power poles are contract
- Where a dispute goes
- The FCC Enforcement Bureau on a pole Section 224 reaches. On a telephone pole, either a Public Utilities Commission access application under SDCL 49-31-15 or a complaint under SDCL 49-13-1, but not both, SDCL 49-13-1.1 requiring an election. Court on a contract pole. A highway permit application can also put cost apportionment before a board of county commissioners under SDCL 31-26-15, which is a named body with a hearing in a state where the attacher otherwise has none
- Confidence
- High confidence on every operative text and on the two validated absence sweeps; Provisional on the pole owner inventory, the state constitutional question, case law other than McKellips, and BEAD figures. South Dakota states no limitation period for a pole claim, because it has no pole regime to carry one
AuthoritiesSDCL 49-34A-1(12)SDCL 49-31-5.1SDCL 49-31-15SDCL 49-31-18SDCL 49-13-1SDCL 49-13-1.1SDCL 31-26-15SDCL 9-35-1FCC DA 22-630