Section 224 is the statute that gives the FCC authority over pole attachment rates. Subpart J is the rulebook of timelines, notices, and complaint procedures that carries it out. Neither one applies the same way to every pole. Here is what actually governs the pole you are attaching to, and what changed in 2026.
Section 224 of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. Section 224, is the Pole Attachment Act of 1978. It gives the FCC jurisdiction to set just and reasonable rates, terms, and conditions for attaching cable and telecommunications lines to poles owned by investor-owned utilities.
Without Section 224, a pole owner that also competes with you, or simply has no reason to move quickly, would set its own price and its own timeline for letting you attach. Section 224 exists because Congress decided that access to poles is close enough to a bottleneck that it needed a federal backstop. What it does not do is apply uniformly. Two structural carve-outs matter to every fiber builder before a single invoice gets reviewed: which government has jurisdiction, and which poles are covered at all.
Section 224 includes what is usually called reverse preemption. A state can certify to the FCC that it regulates pole attachments itself, and once it does, the FCC's rate formula steps aside in favor of the state's own rules for that state's investor-owned utility poles.
The practical takeaway: before you can say a charge is out of line, you have to know which rulebook applies to that specific pole. An investor-owned utility pole in a non-certified state answers to the FCC formula and Subpart J. The same pole one state over may answer to a completely different state formula. And a cooperative or municipal pole may answer to neither, unless it was covered by state law already or its owner took BEAD funding.
The FCC's Fifth Report and Order, FCC 25-38, took effect May 7, 2026, after Paperwork Reduction Act approval that April. It replaced a single one-size timeline with tiers based on how many poles are in the request.
The baseline: a 45-day survey window and a 14-day estimate window, both unchanged. Once the attacher pays, the utility has 30 days for communications-space make-ready and 90 days for work above it, in the electric supply space.
Its own tier, not a copy of the regular one: 60 days to survey, 14 days to estimate, then 75 days for communications-space make-ready and 135 days for electric-space make-ready after payment. A deployment large enough to be a mid-sized order owes the utility at least 15 days' advance notice.
A new tier with its own defined timeline: 90 days to survey, 29 days to estimate, 120 days for communications-space make-ready, and 180 days for electric-space make-ready after payment. It requires 60 days' advance written notice and a meet-and-confer.
These run on good-faith negotiation rather than a fixed default. An attacher can still lock in certainty for part of the order: it may designate the lesser of the first 6,000 poles or 10% of the utility's poles in the state to run under the Large Order timeline, and the utility must allow it.
When an attacher requests approval to use a qualified outside contractor for surveys or engineering, the utility has 30 days to respond. Miss the deadline, and the contractor is deemed approved.
A utility that knows it will miss a deadline must say so, in writing, within 15 days. Say so, and the attacher can invoke self-help immediately on receiving that notice. Stay silent, and the utility gains nothing: the attacher waits out the original deadline, then self-help opens up on schedule. Self-help never covers a pole replacement, in any tier.
Subpart J also sets out the formal path for disputing a pole owner's rates, terms, or conditions when informal resolution has not worked: a complaint filed with the FCC, on a defined pleading schedule, that can result in an order correcting the rate or the conduct.
Most overcharges never need to reach that stage. A cited, line-item findings report showing what was billed, what the agreement and the governing rule actually allow, and the dollar gap is usually enough to get a credit without a filing. The complaint process exists as leverage in the background, and as the formal remedy when a pole owner will not correct a clear violation voluntarily. PoleProof's review is built to produce exactly the kind of documentation a Subpart J complaint would need, prepared and filed by your own counsel, if it ever gets that far.
Treat the jurisdiction question as step one on every pole, not an afterthought.
Investor-owned utility, certified-state utility, cooperative, or municipality: the answer changes which rulebook applies and what your leverage actually is.
A 4,000-pole build now has defined survey and make-ready windows it did not have before FCC 25-38. Hold the pole owner to them.
Honest notice of a coming delay hands you the right to self-help right then. Silence buys the utility nothing: you wait out the original deadline and self-help opens up regardless. Get any notice in writing, since it fixes the date your rights start.
PoleProof checks the charge against the agreement and the rule that actually governs that pole, not a generic assumption, and returns findings you can act on.
One free check. No account, no commitment. Send one invoice or estimate and your attachment agreement, and get a dispute-ready finding back within ten business days.
Run a free check →